“We are building a $20 million warehouse. How do we choose a general contractor, and should we use design-build?”
The owner has a budget and a site and no firm in mind. The firm that explains delivery methods plainly gets considered.
You have the projects, the repeat clients and the prequalification file. AI assistants now draw up a first shortlist before an RFQ is written, and established firms are often missing from it. We fix that, with SEO as the foundation, project-type pages as the proof, and outreach to named owners where it helps.
Free instant audit. See what AI says about you.
Built to get you named in
AI answer
Illustrative example

Owners, developers, facility managers and public agencies describe a project to an AI assistant before they write a scope. Each of these questions is a place your firm is either named or absent.
“We are building a $20 million warehouse. How do we choose a general contractor, and should we use design-build?”
The owner has a budget and a site and no firm in mind. The firm that explains delivery methods plainly gets considered.
“Best architecture firm for a mixed-use development”
A typology query. AI looks for firms that say they do mixed-use, and for projects that prove it.
“Who builds data centres in the Southeast?”
Region and project type together. Market pages, named projects and trade-media lists feed the answer.
“Design-build vs design-bid-build for a hospital expansion: which is faster, and which firms do it well?”
A buyer weighing delivery methods. Honest comparisons that admit when bid-build is the better route are rare, which makes them quotable.
“Our county needs a design team for a new library. How does selection work, and which firms should we shortlist?”
A public agency on its first big job. The answer leans on qualifications-based selection explainers and firms that show comparable civic work.
“Which engineering firms have the strongest safety record for industrial projects?”
Safety is a prequalification question. AI repeats what firms publish, so figures must be exact, current and sourced.
Examples of how buyers phrase these questions, not measured search volumes.
Much of the work in this industry is won through relationships and past projects, often before a formal RFP exists. AI assistants do not see any of that.
By the time a formal request is issued, an owner has usually formed a view of who is credible. That view is increasingly shaped by what an AI assistant says when asked, and it only repeats what is published.
In our audit of 20 established firms, a firm’s own website was 1.3% of the sources AI cited. Trade-media rankings, encyclopaedia entries, directories and contractor guides supplied the rest.
Whatever was asked, the same names returned. Turner Construction was named as an alternative in 25 of 100 answers, Bechtel in 17 and AECOM in 15, counting name variants as one.
A gallery of photographs does not say who the owner was, what the delivery method was, what the firm’s role was or what changed because of it. Without those facts there is nothing for AI to quote.
These sources appeared most often in our audit of 20 established firms. If you are absent or inaccurate in them, you are harder to name.
Counted across 792 citations in our October 2026 audit. Local-style questions drew on Yelp and Houzz, comparison questions on trade-media rankings. A source appearing here is not an endorsement, and we do not guarantee placement in any ranking or directory.
We asked AI assistants five buyer questions per firm, with the firm’s name left out. The firms are among the best known in their field, and the pattern still held.
60.0%
Average AI visibility across 20 established firms and 100 buyer queries
6 of 20
Local-style questions that named the firm, against 17 of 20 for comparisons
1 of 20
Named in none of its five queries
1.3%
Of cited sources were the firm’s own website

Research
Every firm, every score, the full method and its limits. Free to read.
Read the full auditMostly very large global and national architects, engineers and contractors, chosen by us rather than at random, so this likely flatters small and mid-size regional firms. One run on one day, and AI answers change. Three more firms could not be scanned.
In our audit, seven of the ten citations to a firm’s own site went to a sector, service or project-type page, not a homepage. So the unit of work is the project type, and each one needs a page that answers what that owner asks. Here is how we start for six common types.
A page for the typology, with named projects, the owner type, the delivery method, phasing and infection-control approach, and your role. Sourced from your project files and reviewed by the project lead.
Buyers ask by capacity, region and speed. One market page per type of facility, with scale, programme and your self-perform capability stated exactly. Trade-media lists for this sector were cited repeatedly, so presence there matters.
Agencies ask process questions first. A plain explainer of qualifications-based selection and prequalification, linked to comparable public projects, written to respect procurement rules.
A decision guide that compares design-build and bid-build honestly, with typical questions to ask a builder, and a project page for each facility type you deliver in each region.
Typology pages that pair the design story with built outcomes and the owner’s brief, plus the awards and rankings that corroborate it, stated accurately.
Service and sector pages that name the asset class, the standards you work to and the licences held by state. Firm sector pages like these were among the own-site pages AI cited in our audit.

AI assistants and Google read the web the same way. They look for a clear entity, direct answers and agreement from sources they trust. We build all three, in the order that gets your firm named.
01
Who you are, which project types you deliver, in which regions and for which owners, with licences, registrations and prequalification credentials stated the same way everywhere.
02
Project-type pages and case studies built around the facts an owner asks for: owner type, size, delivery method, your role, the challenge and what the project delivered. Drafted from your project files and approved by your project leads.
03
Trade-media rankings, awards, directories and project-owner references shape what AI names. We help your firm be present and accurate there, openly and without paying for placement we would not disclose.
04
We track how assistants describe your firm across the questions owners ask, by project type and region, and report it next to search performance and RFP invitations received.
SEO is the foundation of all of this, and we run it properly: technical health, structure, content and links. The aim is the AI answer, because that is where the shortlist is forming. The work that gets a firm cited tends to strengthen classic search as well, but we do not promise rankings, citations or a number of invitations to bid.
Answer four questions and see which lane fits a firm like yours. It is a starting point for the discovery call, not a quote.
Your recommendation
Answer the four questions to see which lane fits.
It takes about twenty seconds. The answer is a starting point for the discovery call, not a quote.
They find you
$2,500 a month
Or $6,000 a quarter, or $18,000 a year, paid up front.
AEO, GEO and SEO programme with visitor identification and scoring, so the attention you earn is worked, not just counted.
How AEO and GEO workYou reach them
$2,500 a month
Or $6,000 a quarter, or $18,000 a year, paid up front.
Managed outreach across calls, email and LinkedIn to the accounts you choose, timed by buying signals, with human approval before anything sends.
How signal-based outbound worksBoth, as one system
$5,000 a month
Or $12,000 a quarter, or $36,000 a year, paid up front.
Inbound and Outbound together, synced to one file per prospect, so nothing falls between the two.
Compare the three lanesBilled monthly with no lock-in. We recommend around six months because search and AI citations compound, but it is a recommendation, not a minimum. Prices exclude taxes. Full pricing and Terms.
No benchmarks and no promises. Enter your own figures and see what a few more qualified invitations from search and AI would be worth against the programme fee.
Your numbers, not ours
The figures pre-filled are placeholders, not benchmarks. Replace them with yours. If you do not have them yet, the manual audit estimates demand for you.
2.4
Pursuits a month
0.5
New clients a month
$72,000
New fees a month
0.2
Months to cover six months of fees
Six months of the programme at monthly billing is $15,000. At $150,000 a client, one new client covers it.
Arithmetic on the figures you entered. It is not a forecast and not a promise of results, and it ignores churn, repeat work and cost of service.
Architecture and engineering are licensed professions, contractors are licensed state by state, and public procurement has its own contact rules. We write and reach out with all of that in mind, and your principals approve everything before it goes live.
In most US states only licensed individuals may call themselves architects, and engineering titles are regulated too, with rules that differ by state. We write claims that match each person’s licence, and show licence numbers where your state expects them. California, for example, requires a contractor’s licence number in advertising.
We state your actual role on each project, such as architect of record, design-builder or subcontractor, and only name owners and projects you are free to name. Awards, certifications, bonding and safety figures are stated exactly, current and verifiable.
Many public bodies restrict contact with staff and selection committees once a solicitation is issued, often called a cone of silence. Federal rules also prohibit disclosing or obtaining certain procurement information before award. We do not run outreach into an open solicitation.
Public employees are often limited in what they may accept, and some jurisdictions treat efforts to influence a procurement as lobbying that may need registration. We keep outreach informational, aimed at organisations, and check with your counsel when a pursuit touches these rules.
General information, not legal advice. Licensing, advertising and procurement rules differ by state, country and agency, and your own licensing boards, counsel and solicitation documents apply. Check each solicitation for its own communication rules.
Both are free. One is instant and automated. The other is a person doing the full job.
Option one: instant
Enter your domain and our AI visibility checker shows how assistants talk about your AEC firm today and which pages they read to build the answer.

Option two: a real person
A member of our team reviews your business by hand. You get the findings and the data, free, whether or not you work with us.
Free for established businesses auditing their own site. Please use your business email so we can match it to your domain, or email [email protected] confirming the site is yours. We do not run free audits for agencies working on behalf of clients. See white label AEO.
Works on whatever your website runs on
The questions we get asked first.
Because AI names what is clearly described and widely corroborated. If your projects are shown as photographs and your firm is thin on the rankings, directories and trade media AI trusts, it is hard to place, however strong your record is.
SEO earns a place in a list of links. AEO and GEO aim to get your firm named inside the answer an AI assistant gives. They share foundations, so we do both, but the AI answer is the aim because that is where owners increasingly start.
It matters most before the RFP, when an owner or developer is forming a view of who is credible. It also matters when someone on the selection team looks you up. We never suggest it replaces relationships, only that it should not undermine them.
By structuring each project around the facts a buyer asks for: owner type, size, delivery method, your role, the challenge and the outcome. Pages grouped by sector and typology are the easiest for AI to quote, and in our audit most cited own-site pages were of that kind.
Yes. We write for licensing and title rules from the first draft, we do not run outreach into open public solicitations, and nothing goes live without your approval. Rules differ by state and agency, so your own counsel should make the final call.
In our audit they were the most-cited sources, alongside Wikipedia. We help you be present and accurate in them and tell you which are paid before you decide. We never buy links or run fake reviews.
Yes, with Outbound or Full Hybrid. We build a named list of owners, developers and facility teams that buy what you build and reach them as organisations, not through open public solicitations, with your approval of every message.
No. We do not guarantee rankings, AI citations, invitations to bid or won projects, and nobody honest can. We tell you plainly what we expect for your sectors, and we say so if this is not the right fit.
Inbound is $2,500 a month on monthly billing with no long-term commitment, or $6,000 a quarter or $18,000 a year paid up front. Outbound is the same price and Full Hybrid is $5,000 a month. We recommend around six months, but you can cancel any time.
Yes. The instant audit runs on our AI visibility checker. A manual audit is done by a person for firms reviewing their own site, using a business email matched to your domain. We do not run free audits for agencies working for clients.
Thirty minutes. We look at where you stand in AI answers and search, who is being named instead, and whether this programme makes sense for your business. If it does not, we will say so.
Pick a time that suits you
The calendar is provided by our scheduling partner. Loading it connects to their servers, which may set cookies. See our Cookie Policy.
Calendar not loading? Open the booking page in a new tab
100 live grounded buyer queries and 792 citations, run in October 2026. Average visibility 60.0%. Three more firms could not be scanned.
Model provisions on licensure and the use of the title architect. Each US jurisdiction sets its own law, which takes precedence.
Contractor advertising rules, including display of the licence number. An example of a state requirement, not a national rule.
Statutory prohibitions on disclosing or obtaining contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information before federal contract award.
One example of a local cone of silence, which restricts communication about an advertised solicitation until award recommendation. Rules vary by agency.
Illustrates how some jurisdictions treat efforts to influence a procurement as lobbying. Registration rules differ by jurisdiction.
Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and the other names and logos shown on this page are trademarks of their respective owners. They are shown to identify the search and AI platforms, website platforms and publications we refer to, and do not imply endorsement or affiliation. The AI answer mock-up and buyer questions are illustrative.